As discussed in the Chap 1.1, jet-fighter go
to high AoA region to achieve higher turning performance without increasing
wing area (drag). As you can see in Fig. 1.16, lift coefficient is proportional
to AoA while drag is square of AoA or the lift coefficient. There are three
methods, increasing wing area, lift device, and expanding AoA region, for lift
increment of the aircraft; each method has their own pros and cons for jet
fighter application.
Fig 1.16 Lift and drag curve
of typical jet fighter
Fig. 1.17 Sizing of jet
fighter (W/S, T/W)
Most simple one of the three is increasing
wing area without chaning wing planform or aerofoils however, its impact on
design criteria is significant than the others as shown in Fig. 1.17. Subsonic
maneuverability at high alitude better did the increased wing area make while
wing become prone to weight increase, loads problem at high dynamic pressure
condition, and drag at high speed. Weight increase is very obvious via
increment of wing area because more spars, ribs, skins, and actuators are
needed. Loads problem is also clear that longer arm of the wing compel
reinforced structure at the wing root to mitigate deflection of the wing. This
phenomenon goes severe at low altitude with higher air density which forces
higher dynamic pressure on the wing, and this is why low altitude penetrating
aircraft (TSR.2 as shown in Fig. 1.18) has relatively small wing area than
similar class aircrafts (Some low penetrators such as Tornado, F-111, and Su-24
choose variable swept wing to adapt complex mission profile; they should have
good flight characteristics at both high and low altitude cruise).
Contribution of the jet fighter drag is simulataneously
changed at its speed and alitutude. At the high altitude and subsonic
condition, aircraft faces low dynamic pressure and requires higher AoA to lift
own weight (survivability from AAA, cruise efficiency of engine made jet
fighter go to high altitude). However as you saw in Fig. 1.16, higher AoA
generates more induced drag, and designers try to avoid that kind of situation.
Low altitude or supersonic condition with higher dynamic pressure condition,
everything has changed for not only structural load problem as described in the
previous paragraph also for the drag. In the high dynamic pressure condition,
required lift coefficient for cruise become small and contribution of the
induced drag is negligible. At that time drag of the aircarft shape and area is
truly important, but unfortunately, larger wing area provides more
skin-friction and form drag which give negative impact on the acceleration and
maximum speed performance. Indeed, increasing wing area for the lift increment
is sensitive issue for the aircraft designers which cannot easily be chosen
without sacrificing other performance parameters.
Fig. 1.18 TSR.2 of British; smaller
wing helps this aircraft to be a better low altitude penetrator, however
complex jet flap and higher AoA is required for its take-off and landing.
Fig. 1.19 Tornado, F-111,
Su-24; As customers of these aircrafts requires long range (high altitude
cruise with low induced drag) and low altitude penetration capability (smaller
drag at higher dynamic pressure region), designers select variable swept wing
to response to the complex mission profile. Usage of variable wing is now rare
as low altitude intruder tactics become legacy of the past.
Fig. 1.20 Breakdown of the
drag structure (Sadraey M., Aircraft Performance Analysis, 2009)
Fig. 1.21 U-2; most famous
and dramatic example of the high altitude cruiser wing design. Russian M-4 and
B-52 also chose high aspect ratio wing to increase cruise efficiency at the
dedicated altitude. These aircraft do not have any serious consideration on
acceleration and maximum speed requirement like jet fighters, and could choose
large-cruise-effecient type wing.
Adding lift devices on the wing is effective
way than changing wing size in that side effect of the first method would be
mitigated. This active method is similar to compromise between maximum lift and
cruise or maxmimum speed condition; leading and trailing edge of the aerofoil
is intentionally changed to achieve wanted lift and drag characteristics. Good
reference is provided by Hoerner for the lift and drag change effect of the
flap, and numerous flap devices had been developed for not only fixed wing
aircraft but for cars and rotary wing aircraft (Very detailed discussions on
the lift devices take large volume of talk and I recommended to read Hoerner’s
work). If you have any chance to watch air-show or its video on You-Tube, you
can figure out that leading edge and trailing edge devices are changed
simultaneously during the maneuver of the aircraft as shown in Fig. 1.22.
LE devices helps aircraft to adjust AoA for their wings to generate
maximum L/D in various AoA conditions, so, many of fighter jets choose LE flaps
or slat which also delay flow separation problem at high AoA limiting maximum
lift of the aircraft. In general, slat type LE devices are more effective than
simple LE flap because slat type can provide fresh air on the upper surface of aerofoil
which suppress flow separation, and carefully designed slat accelerates of the
fresh air to increase lift. This is why the slat type is popular for airliners
which requires very large lift at take-off and landing conditions; however,
this type requires relatively more complex mechanism for operation than simple
LE flaps. Indeed, for jet fighters, the slat type is chosen when higher lift
coefficient is required (F-14 or other naval fighters) or planform is delta
which is prone to flow separation and need higher lift increment via LE device.
Compare to LE devices, TE flap
is optional for the turn performance because it has clearer pros and cons than
the LE ones. TE flap could generate massive lift at given AoA condition, which
leads to induced drag. In the point of view for the lift, TE flap scheduling is
effective way to increase lift, however, it can harm L/D performance of the
fighter. So, If the jet turns with its TE flap, it can turn quickly than
without it, but it loses most of its speed. This is why TE flap is optional for
the turn performance enhancement as shown in Fig. 1.22. Only F/A-18 series,
F-22A, and F-2A uses its TE flap during the turn while others did not. When the
designers of each aircraft scheduling the flap deflection, balance between
instantaneous and sustained turn affect decision of the usage of the TE flaps.
As discussed in earlier, use of the TE flap could enhance the instantaneous
turn performance, however, un-wanted induced drag gave negative impact on the
sustained turn performance. Possible compromising method for this situation is
that TE flap is deflected only when the jet certainly loses its energy. This
method probably be used by the designers who should optimize their jet however,
unfortunately, effectiveness of the most TE flap is gradually decreased at the
high AoA region. So, the jet fighter like F-16, and Su-35 did not choose to use
TE flap during the turn; designers gave more weight on sustaining energy rather
than instantaneous turn.
As a summary of the adding lift
devices on the jet fighter, compare to the previous simple method, increase of
the main wing area, the adding lift devices enhance the turn performance without
harming speed related performance, and be loved by many aeronautical engineers
who should satisfy their customers. Complex flap system could provide
attractive increment of lift coefficient however this level of the system costs
complexity and structural weakness. And engineers should notice that
effectiveness of the flap is not guaranteed at the various flow conditions
where the jet fighter should encounter.
** Additionally, F-22A deflects its aileron in the counter direction
of the TE flap, and it probably related to the suppression of the wing-tip flow
separation. Role of this kinds of technique will be discussed in the high AoA
part.
Fig. 1.22 Various examples (F/A-18A,
F/A-18F, F-22A, Su-35, F-2A, F-16, Eurofighter, Mirage 2000) of LE and TE
device scheduling. F/A-18A, F/A-18F, F-22A, and F-2A uses their TE and LE flaps
to maximize their turn performance while others uses only LE flaps. Details of
reason is described in the text.
Fig. 1.23 Various flap types
(LE and TE)
Last method we discuss here is making jet
fighter enter the high AoA. Fig. 1.16 naturally reveals aircraft can achieve
higher lift at high AoA. ‘Using high AoA region for turn’ shows similar
characteristics of using TE flap; it induces more lift and costs drag to lose
its speed. In F-16, designers limited its max AoA due to its deep-stall
characteristic, on the other hands, F-16 can maintain its speed during the turn
due to the effort of this limiter. In the old days of ‘dog fighting era’,
balance of the ‘sustain’ and ‘instantaneous’ capability of the F-16 deserves
praise, however, advent of the modern short range missiles does not give any
rooms for ‘sustain’ turn. Few quicker instantaneous turn could determine jet
fighter’s fate. Maybe this kind of trend change is a reason why USAF choose
F-35 as replacement of F-16 which cannot maintain higher turn rate for a long
time than its predecessor. They also thought capability related to the energy
can be covered by advantage of sensors and stealth, and sustaining turn
capability will become legacy of the old school due to the fatality of short
range missiles and future-possible-laser-turret which will neutralize any advantage
of traditional fighters. Compare to the additional lift devices on the wing and
increase of wing area, entering high AoA region to achieve better turning
performance does not require any additional mechanical system, weight, and degradation
of other performance parameters, and amount of the obtained lift is much larger
than that of lift devices. Indeed, due to the effort of growth of the computational
fluid dynamics (CFD) and advanced flight control system, AoA limit of jet
fighter is relaxed for most 4.5th and 5th generation
fighters.
In the previous paragraph, there is no reason
to hesitate using higher AoA region for turn, however, every fighter cannot
enter high AoA region. Why? Aeronautical risk holds back of the aircraft to
enter the high AoA. Aircraft including jet fighters have various wing surfaces
with deflectable part to maintain stability in air-flow perturbation. Two
directional perturbation of the aircraft are change of AoA and Side-slip angle
of the flow which can drive aircraft in departure status (un-controllable
status of the aircraft which should be avoided). Vertical and horizontal tails
stabilize aircraft in longitudinal, directional and lateral directions, however,
effectiveness of the tails is decreased as AoA is increased. Details of the high
AoA aerodynamics will be discussed in Chap. 2, however, brief reasons for HARD
things in the high AoA is shown in next paragraph.
At the high AoA, aircraft fall into very-different
dynamics; main reason for this change is wake from main wing and body as shown
in Fig. 1.24. As AoA is increased, projected area from the aircraft is
increased, and dramatic flow field change occurs such as vortex generation,
vortex breakdown, flow bubble, and its separation. These kinds of non-linear
aerodynamics behavior make aircraft un-predictable and dangerous. Except,
aircraft having canard or similar control surfaces, horizontal and vertical
tails is submerged in the downstream of this ‘non-linear’, and it results that
aircraft can lose effectiveness of the tails at high AoA. If the tails lose
their effectiveness, problem is not just ‘lose control’; AoA and side-slip
angles can be diverged and lead to fatal spin which took lots of lives of
pilots at the early time of the aviation. Although the aircraft does not fall
into that kind of deadly event, problems like wing-rock or buffet still should
be considered in high AoA to provide appropriate handling quality for the
pilots.
As a summary of the entering high AoA, it does not require any
sacrifice of other performance or additional mechanical system. Although usefulness
of the method is limited for instantaneous turn, the instantaneous turn
performance is emphasized in modern air-to-air combat. Only obstacle for the
entering high AoA is un-predictable characteristics of flow separation which
leads to fatal accident of the aircraft. However, modern control strategy and
CFD help to expand AoA limit of the jet fighters without taking risky flight
tests. Indeed, high AoA aerodynamics is important for achieving better fighting
capability of the fighter, and I will deeply discuss about high AoA
aerodynamics at the next Chap. 2.
Fig. 1.24 Wake problem via
high AoA wake of main wing